Best-case argument for attending: if you already have real filmmaking experience and two years you can afford to give up entirely (free from employment, free to work on your own projects) this can work for you. That's the most generous case I can make for it. Read on before you believe it.
Curriculum & Compression
I'm currently in Term 3, taking Term 4 classes in the middle of it. The program runs six terms total, and right now it's visibly compressed: courses overlap, previously scheduled classes get pushed and repeated later, and students are expected to keep working through what should be break periods. Earlier coursework (story and script development) was genuinely strong. The current restructuring has undercut that. Each skill is taught once, and you're expected to arrive at mastery from a single pass, with no built-in debrief or skill-share to go back and correct what didn't land. Because terms are split by crew role, you may operate a given role in one term and never touch it again in a later term where you'd actually need it.
Faculty
The professors I've worked with are genuinely good, that's not in dispute. What is in dispute is how much room they have to teach. Term leaders are currently under real pressure to justify their own courses within the restructuring, which is squeezing the time and depth they can put into teaching rather than institutional defense. Good people operating inside a system that's actively being compressed under them.
Facilities & Equipment
Split campus, weak facilities. The sound booths are not soundproofed, and they sit on the same floor as the edit bay: sound bleeds in from the building, other classes, even the elevator, in every session, with no mitigation plan I've seen. Clean ADR or foley is effectively not achievable. The stages aren't soundproofed either, and you're shooting on film. Equipment itself is decent, but there isn't enough of it for the number of cohorts running through the program at once: three intakes a year, drawing from an inconsistent range of prior experience and preparation.
Culture & Peer Accountability
This is the part that will matter most if you're coming in with real experience. Collaboration culture here is weak. Peers not showing up to set, showing up late, or not participating carries no real consequence. If you're experienced, you don't get pushed further by the program, you get absorbed as unpaid labor covering for peers who aren't at your level. That's not "prospering." It's your competence being used to patch gaps the school isn't addressing.
Alumni Network
For a school with nearly 70 years of history, there's effectively no alumni network. What exists is being built now, slowly, rather than something you're plugged into on arrival.
Cost of Living (London)
Tuition itself is affordable relative to US film school pricing. Everything around it isn't. Budget roughly £15–20 per meal if you're not cooking every night, £1,500+ for rent, and if you're not in student housing, expect to need a guarantor or a full year's rent up front. Factor this in before you factor in tuition.
Who Should Apply
Honestly, if you already have filmmaking experience, this program will use that experience rather than build on it. You'll spend your two years functioning as de facto crew and quality control for less-prepared peers, inside a curriculum that's currently being compressed and reshuffled under real institutional strain, with facilities that can't reliably deliver clean sound. If you're coming in with little to no experience, you may get more out of the raw trial-and-error, but with no structured debrief and single-pass teaching, "mastery" is left almost entirely up to you.
I wouldn't recommend this program as it currently stands. If you go in anyway, go in knowing exactly what you're walking into.