NYU Tisch Kanbar Institute of Film & Television Reviews & Admissions Statistics

Location
Broadway Block, 721 Broadway, New York, NY 10003, USA
School Website
https://tisch.nyu.edu/kanbar-institute
Degrees Offered
  1. 4 Year BS
  2. 4 Year BFA
  3. 3 Year MFA
  4. MFA/MBA Dual Degree Program
  5. Certificate Program
  6. Summer Programs
Concentrations
  1. Directing
  2. Film & Television Production
  3. Film Studies
  4. Business / Film Dual Degree
  5. Screenwriting
Tuition Range
$60k to $70k
Undergraduate Deadlines
Film BFA Early Decision I: November 1
Film BFA Early Decision II: January 1
Film BFA Regular Decision: January 5
Stern/Tisch BS/BFA Dual Degree: February 15
Cinema Studies BA: : December 1
Graduate Deadlines
December 1

Reviews summary

6
 
75%
0
 
0%
0
 
0%
2
 
25%
0
 
0%
Overall rating
4.25 star(s) 8 ratings
Affordability
1.71 star(s)
Alumni Network
4.25 star(s)
Campus
4.50 star(s)
Career Assistance
3.29 star(s)
Coursework
4.43 star(s)
Facilities & Equipment
4.63 star(s)
Professors
4.38 star(s)
Scholarships
3.60 star(s)
50% are recommending this film school.
NYU Dual Degree MBA/MFA Program
Reviewed by: Alumni
Degree: Other
Concentration: MBA / MFA
First of all, the program does not provide a safety net in terms of job placement. Every year the program admits, at most, 5 people, and the least the teachers running the program could do is introduce us to companies who are in the market to hire. They are (the teachers) some of the most well-connected in the business, and yet I did not feel they provided enough resources or support when looking for a job. In fact, in the last class that graduated, all 5 did not even end up in jobs within entertainment, but rather other fields. It’s a poor sign on the program when its graduates don’t even end up in the field they tried to pivot too. And the teachers running the program, while very nice, are tone deaf when it comes to hearing and acting on student’s needs for post-grad employment.

Second, and leading from the previous point, the program is not structured in a way that allows the students to take full advantage of either the MBA or the MFA program. Chasing two birds with one stone is highly applicable here. Here is how the program is structured:

  • 1st Year: Business School
  • 1st Year Summer: Film Class
  • 2nd Year: Film School
  • 2nd Year: Business School Internship / Internship
  • 3rd Year: Choice of classes between Film and Business school

Now what’s inherently wrong in this is that the first year when you’re in the business school, the first summer should be your internship summer. But in this program it’s not the case. You have to recruit for an internship in your second year. But by that point in the fall semester, you’re preparing to make your second year film, which is a LOT of work, to the point where you have NO TIME to recruit, which usually takes place in the business school’s fall semester. So by that structure, dual degree students have a very hard time finding an internship, because they DON’T HAVE ANY time to find an internship, which puts them at a disadvantage, and nullifies the usefulness of why we went to an MBA program in the first place. By doing a dual degree, you’re putting your focus in two different directions, which the program does a bad job of managing/structuring.

Within this structure, dual-degree students struggle to build relationships with the filmmaking students whose projects they are meant to produce. While dual-degree students spend their first year in business school, MFA students are already working together, forming strong bonds. By the time dual-degree students join the film school in their second year, they are outsiders rather than integrated members of the cohort. As a result, filmmakers don’t see them as true classmates, making collaboration more challenging.

Third, the dual-degree program fails to teach any hard skills that can’t be learned in a standalone MBA or MFA. It does not justify the three-year commitment or the $200K+ cost. For context, NYU’s Graduate Film program awards the Media Services Producing Award annually to the student who demonstrates the most skill in film producing. In recent years, it has consistently gone to MFA students—not dual-degree students. This raises a fundamental question: If the program doesn’t give its students a competitive edge in producing, what’s the point? The reality is, it doesn’t.

Being a producer is not someone with a business degree (it’s a foreign concept to Hollywood people). It’s just someone that knows how to get things done, and unfortunately, a program for that doesn’t make sense. During my job search, I’ve had two people tell me that the MFA is not worth it and I should take it off. And over time, I’m seeing it as well. The dual degree is nice to have on your resume, but it CANNOT replace work experience.

My recommendation:
  • If you want to work in the corporate side of film, get an MBA. It’s a two-year program, gives you dedicated time to recruit for an internship, and costs significantly less.
  • If you want to be a film producer, get an MFA. It’s a longer path, but you’ll build stronger industry relationships and gain hands-on filmmaking experience—something a business degree won’t provide. Columbia’s graduate film program, for example, offers a producing track within its MFA but no dual degree, which speaks volumes.
  • Prioritize industry experience over degrees. The best way to break into film is by working in the industry and building your network. No one—and I mean no one—cares if you went to school for producing. What matters is your practical experience. Without it, the degree is meaningless.
Affordability
1.00 star(s)
Alumni Network
3.00 star(s)
Campus
3.00 star(s)
Career Assistance
1.00 star(s)
Coursework
2.00 star(s)
Facilities & Equipment
4.00 star(s)
Professors
3.00 star(s)
Scholarships
3.00 star(s)
Anonymous does not recommend this film school!
ninjaPandas1721
ninjaPandas1721
Hey, thanks for posting this. This is very insightful.
Last edited:
J
Jameson345
Sure
Good Education. Poor Everything Else
Reviewed by: Alumni
Degree: MA/MFA
Concentration: Graduate Film
Pros
  • Adjunct Faculty - those who are there strictly to teach are there with good reason and have a world of expertise to share
Cons
  • Administration - lots of internal politicking. lots of internal fighting.
  • Some faculty have been accused of perpetuating sexual harassment still
  • The cost/value - many promised benefits were taken away due to COVID with no recourse
World class education received at NYU Tisch, with some remarkable faculty (those who care to teach are extremely helpful). Lots of bureaucratic nonsense that resulted in administrators lying to class regarding benefits and recourse for missed opportunities due to COVID. Many affected including alumni and current students.

At least one professor on staff has been publicly accused of abetting sexual harassment.
Affordability
1.00 star(s)
Alumni Network
3.00 star(s)
Campus
4.00 star(s)
Career Assistance
2.00 star(s)
Coursework
4.00 star(s)
Facilities & Equipment
4.00 star(s)
Professors
3.00 star(s)
Scholarships
2.00 star(s)
Anonymous does not recommend this film school!
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest Accepted Applications


Acceptance Data
For up to date Film School Acceptance Rates, including Minimum GPAs, Minimum Test Scores, After Interview and Off-Waitlist Acceptance Rates, Film Experience and Undergraduate degrees of accepted applicants, Age data, and other acceptance statistics for your film program of choice simply navigate to the Acceptance Rates tab on each film school's page in our Film School Database.

For example:
Log your own Application with our application database to help improve the site's acceptance data.

Applications
Articles
Forums
Film Schools
Scholarships
Back
Top