sevs
Member
If your current ultimate goal is to live and work in Los Angeles, would it make more sense to attend a school that requires you to borrow more money but is located in LA, or to attend a school that requires you to borrow nearly no money whatsoever but is not located in LA?
Put another way, would you rather sacrifice the potential connections made up front for the significantly lower student loan burden following graduation, or vice-versa? Which sacrifice poses the greater hinderance in the long run? Fewer connections? Or more debt?
Put another way, would you rather sacrifice the potential connections made up front for the significantly lower student loan burden following graduation, or vice-versa? Which sacrifice poses the greater hinderance in the long run? Fewer connections? Or more debt?