Hi everyone!
I was just accepted it both USC's Film Production MFA and Chapman's Directing MFA and I'm extremely grateful as I have absolutely no experience in film. However, I'm at a complete lost on which one would be best for me. I've included my pros/cons below for each, and if anyone could share their experience at or knowledge of either school so I can see if my list is accurate or not I'd really appreciate it
Each school has the same amount of pros and cons so to my eyes they come out even and so I feel like I'm stuck. I've also done a ton of research, so any first-hand experiences would be really appreciated too!
Also if there is a better forum to post this question I can definitely move my post there!
(Also I know the location is a pro and con for both and it seems like a contradiction, but it's because I want to be in LA for the opportunities but am nervous because I'm not used to being in the city and the high cost of rent/living).
USC
Pros:
1. More general program, I can learn to do more things (hoping to write/direct, work with tv, and teach someday. basically want to learn a little of everything. I'm confused about how the "tracks" I read about in some reviews work though)
2. Larger/older institution, so more students and alumni and a more concrete infrastructure
3. Better internship/job opportunities
4. In LA
5. Ranking (though I'm trying not to focus too much on that)
Cons.
1. The area (I'm not used to living in the city)
2. Films are self-funded
3. Don't own films
4. Not everyone makes a thesis film
5. Less access to good equipment
Chapman
Pros:
1. Everyone makes a thesis.
2. Films are funded
3. Own films
4. State-of-the-art equipment
5. Cheaper living costs
Cons.
1. Not in LA (longer commute for jobs)
2. Not as generalized of a program
3. Newer program, so not as many alumni and less students
4. Not as established of a internship/job network
5. Ranking
Tie: Cost
I'm not sure overall which one is less expensive, since Chapman has higher tuition but less "hidden" fees and USC has lower tuition but films are self-funded and more "hidden" fees.
I was just accepted it both USC's Film Production MFA and Chapman's Directing MFA and I'm extremely grateful as I have absolutely no experience in film. However, I'm at a complete lost on which one would be best for me. I've included my pros/cons below for each, and if anyone could share their experience at or knowledge of either school so I can see if my list is accurate or not I'd really appreciate it


(Also I know the location is a pro and con for both and it seems like a contradiction, but it's because I want to be in LA for the opportunities but am nervous because I'm not used to being in the city and the high cost of rent/living).
USC
Pros:
1. More general program, I can learn to do more things (hoping to write/direct, work with tv, and teach someday. basically want to learn a little of everything. I'm confused about how the "tracks" I read about in some reviews work though)
2. Larger/older institution, so more students and alumni and a more concrete infrastructure
3. Better internship/job opportunities
4. In LA
5. Ranking (though I'm trying not to focus too much on that)
Cons.
1. The area (I'm not used to living in the city)
2. Films are self-funded
3. Don't own films
4. Not everyone makes a thesis film
5. Less access to good equipment
Chapman
Pros:
1. Everyone makes a thesis.
2. Films are funded
3. Own films
4. State-of-the-art equipment
5. Cheaper living costs
Cons.
1. Not in LA (longer commute for jobs)
2. Not as generalized of a program
3. Newer program, so not as many alumni and less students
4. Not as established of a internship/job network
5. Ranking
Tie: Cost
I'm not sure overall which one is less expensive, since Chapman has higher tuition but less "hidden" fees and USC has lower tuition but films are self-funded and more "hidden" fees.
Last edited: