Yep, from what I can tell, there appears to be a clear top 6 narrative film schools, and then a huge drop off after that top tier. But Dodge should be firmly entrenched in that top tier.
Chapman is slowly rising up the ranks of film schools, but even now it seems to be the "best kept secret" among the top film schools, mainly because it's newer. But by all accounts, it has the best facilities/equipment of any film school, which should be enough on it's own to put it at or near the top of anyone's rankings, since that's a huge aspect of filmmaking that the school has taken care of right off the bat.
They have been right in line with USC, AFI, Columbia, and NYU at the Student Oscars over the last several years. Chapman had two narrative winners in 2016, one alternative win in 2015, and a narrative nomination in 2017. That's actually significantly better than UCLA, who hasn't had a winner at the student Oscars since 2012, nor have they had a winner in narrative/alternative filmmaking since 2009.
Student Academy Awards - Wikipedia So Chapman is actually better positioned at the Student Oscars than UCLA, and right in line with all the other schools commonly thought of as "elite".
Meanwhile, Chapman has a film production studio literally located on campus, and their alumni are legitimate industry talents, like the Duffer Brothers (Stranger Things) and Justin Simien (Dear White People). Throw in what Elle said about the benefits of a Conservatory, and I'm fully in agreement with her that it looks like the networking options should be just as good as any other school can offer.
Since Dodge is only 22 years old (younger than many of it's applicants) it might not be able to claim a long track record with names like "Francis Ford Coppola" but they shouldn't have to in the first place. Any school who's relying on the name brand of their graduates who came from a different
century is pitching you a false premise. The question is whether or not graduating from this program will help your career goals
today. Dodge seems to be putting their grads in situations where they can succeed, as well or better than any of the other top schools. I don't see anything in my research that would suggest Chapman belongs in a separate tier from the other top 6 schools. Some people might prefer the other schools for their own reasons, which is perfectly fine, but if they're looking down on Chapman/considering it second tier, I don't think they're viewing it correctly.
And also as far as living conditions, Orange County is so much nicer of a place to live than New York or LA. Next year if I get accepted at NYU and Chapman, I would strongly consider turning NYU down.