• Supporting Membership Pricing Increasing on May 1 for New Subscriptions

    To continue expanding the exclusive tools, producing more in-depth interviews with admissions teams, and keeping FilmSchool.org completely ad-free and unbiased, Supporting Membership prices for new subscriptions will increase starting May 1st.

AFI 2011 (3 Viewers)

filmdirector2011, I sure hope you are right about that. My interview did not go so well...or at least I should say, there was a lot left to be desired or desired to be said after mine was over. Anyway, I'm pretty eager to hear my decision on April 15th. Good luck to you and everyone else waiting to hear.
 
tty sure you are
I spoke with an ex AFI admissions processor, she assured me it's a mechanical procedure of following a priority list of ALTs as various positions open up. So guys, come on, stop projecting your feelings and lets try to gather the facts. This forum need not be a melting pot of chaos.
(BTW NYU procedures are not our problem, AFI is the topic of conversation, ya know?)
 
I'm thinking of applying to AFI this coming year and was wondering if anyone could tell me the major differences or advantages (if any) AFI has over the usual culprits, NYU/USC/UCLA/Columbia.

I just recently "discovered" it (I sorta knew of the program but read a good post on it the other day), and don't know too much about it. I hear its better in a way because you get to focus on your chosen discipline. I.e. directors direct, editors edit, etc.
 
It's hard to get any real info out of them, I will say though I know there is one list and I am situated pretty well on the list, but that is about all I could get, I kinda lucked into the info yesterday. I think they can't really tell you much of anything at all.
 
Do you remember their exact words? I ask so that when I call I will be able to discern between what may be a generic reply like "you're pretty well on the list" or were they like yeah man your high on the list but I can't tell you more.
It just seems like the line "pretty well on the list" is so painfully neutral. Were they kinder with greater specificity? Do you remember their exact words?
(Sorry if I'm coming off neurotic the writer in me can't help but dissect.)
 
To be honest it was an email reply and the exact verbage is more specific, but I just don't want to risk getting anyone in trouble, including myself, as I am not sure what the deal is with their information that they give out. I would say the best you can do is just wait it out, I don't think they will give out anymore info on the subject.

I'm sorry I can't be more helpful, it is just such a crazy time you can never know what could track back to hurt any of us or the people at admissions who are trying to help us as best as they can.
 
Respects Robbie. No worries. I share in your concerns. It sucks we all have to be in such a fragile state but if this wasn't precious to us it wouldn't be worth the wait.
 
Sorry to hear bout that bird dude.

Hey Robbie! happy for ya :)

All this speculation is making me loco. I am going to take a few days off from this forum because logging in every one hour is not going to get me in any sooner.Good luck to all the waitlisters!
Lets keep each other in the loop :D

Have to get back to life now!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Originally posted by KrisKelvin:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Colin Oh:
Also, AFI rarely takes people straight out of undergrad. Don't let it get you down. You just need to get out into the real world and work a for a while and then apply again. They like people who re-apply.

I'd posted a much longer response but will pare it down to this:

If AFI (or any school for that matter) did not accept me solely because of my age, and/or based on the assumption that I would reapply at some point in the future, then I sincerely hope they consider increasing the minimum age for application. I spent a lot of time fine tuning my materials, when clearly there are other things I would have been doing had I been told in advance "sorry, but you're too young".

And that concludes my mini-rant for the day. :) </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

KrisKelvin,

I haven't posted on this thread previously, but I have been following it and many of the other threads for awhile. I'd just like to assure KrisKelvin that while ColinOh is correct about the average age of AFI's Fellows is something like 27, for many, many years, they have accepted 22 year olds either right out of college, or who had not even graduated from college yet. And, they have also accepted Fellows in their 30's and 40's. This year alone, AmiraAlexandria finished undergraduate school in 2010 and was just accepted to AFI, and UCFFilmgirl hasn't finished her undergraduate degree and she was accepted to AFI! Also, if you look back in the AFI blogs from prior years, you'll find similar instances of this demographic. You'll find a screenwriter from Phoenix in his late 30's who was accepted to AFI. He gave up a fairly successful career and moved to L.A. to follow his "dreams" as a screenwriter. The point I'm making is that the average age of AFI's Fellows may be mid- to late-20's, but that average is comprised of Fellows ranging in age from 22 to perhaps, 40. I'm sure I don't need to tell you that AFI's Conservatory of Film has been around since 1969, it has graduated more than 3,000 Fellows since then, and it is ranked consistently among the top 5 film schools in the U.S. The admissions decision-makers have too much at stake to consider an applicant's as a criteria of who it accepts to its prestigious program. They would NEVER be that shallow.

I wish you good luck on your decision. I also totally agree with those who have said that once UCLA, Columbia and Chapman make their acceptance announcements, AFI will have to accept additional people. Each of the top grad schools have a different approach to teaching the art of filmmaking, and each of them has a reputation for being the "best" in one or more disciplines. AFI is a fantastic school, but there are some people who will choose UCLA, Columbia, or Chapman over AFI. Therefore, my best advice is to try to relax as best you can and let the process run its course. It's NOT over yet for you or anyone else who hasn't already been rejected.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You are right FilmSchoolDad, since I know many AFI alum that went straight out of undergrad. And when I say rare, I really mean they accept maybe between 1 and 3 a year for each discipline. What I do know is they hold you to a different criteria then say someone that has been working in the film industry for the past 10 years. Of course, I am only talking about the cinematography discipline because that is the program I know most about.
 
I've been reading that the interview is like orientational rather that Q & A format, well I have to say NOT IN MY CASE.

I just had the interview and oh my god, they asked who was (I can't remember the name), who was the man in the poster behind them and A LOT of questions of my portfolio in terms of "what do you think is the most important thing a long the proccess?", "why did you do this?", what do you wanted to say with that?". "do you have any other interests apart from films?, "do you read?".... etc

I mean, they were certainly tryign to bring something out of the interview. It wasn't chill at all.

Anyway, I tried my best, now wait until the 15th of april.
 
Log your film school application with our Application Database so that we can improve our admissions statistics.



Users who are viewing this thread


Latest Accepted Applications

This Application in the Scattergram

Unlock Film School Admissions Insights

Stop guessing about your chances. See exactly where you stand with real data from 5,000+ applications by becoming a Supporting Member.

This Application in the Scattergram

  • See applications plotted by GPA + Film Experience
  • View real outcomes: Admitted, Waitlisted, Denied, Awaiting Results
  • Hover for full application details

+ 45 Exclusive Admissions Charts

Acceptance rates, reapplication success, interview impact, portfolio breakdowns, and more.

Instant access • Cancel anytime

Latest Film School Reviews

  • DePaul University - School of Cinematic Arts
    4.00 star(s)
    Overall good
    While I was there, parts of the directing track felt like they were still evolving, so the quality of classes was a bit uneven. Some were...
    • Anonymous
  • Stony Brook University (SUNY)
    5.00 star(s)
    Stony Brook TV Writing MFA
    I love this program so much. If you are interested in TV Writing this is the best program for it. We have incredibly talented writers and the...
    • glafmay1
  • San Diego State University - School of Theatre, Television, and Film
    3.00 star(s)
    Nothing special
    You really kind of get what you pay for with this program. It might be one of the cheapest programs out there but it’s also one of the most...
    • Anonymous
  • USC School of Cinematic Arts
    5.00 star(s)
    USC is a Lighthouse
    The School of Cinematic Arts has essentially been created in the image of a corporate film studio. Artistically successful films you make at this...
    • Anonymous
  • Full Sail University
    4.00 star(s)
    Self Motivated? You'll Do Fine
    I did the 27 month, online, Digital Cinematography Bachelor’s degree at Full Sail. It is basically a film degree with the added focus of trying to...
    • Pryde Pierce

Latest Applications

Latest questions

Latest Articles

Latest Accepted Applications

Applications
Articles
Forums
Film Schools
Scholarships
Back
Top