Icarus Ascending
Well-Known Member
I'm popping in to make my annual "stop freaking out" post, because I wish someone had told me the same when I was applying to film school.
First: to debunk some rumors, USC is not Harvard Law, and UCLA is not Juilliard. The USC Grad Screenwriting Program accepts about 12-15% of applicants outright and waitlists another 5% or so; UCLA Screenwriting has similar numbers; AFI SW accepts almost 30% of its pool outright, and if you add in waitlisters, the number must approach 40%. I don't know the numbers for Production programs, except to say that USC Production admits a *higher* percentage of its applicants than does USC SW.
The point is, these are not hyper-selective programs that accept only three or four students a year. They are gigantically, humongously enormous grad programs which collectively accept hundreds of students annually. Add to this the fact that their applicant pools are not terribly self-selective (only smart, educated people are applying to the Anthropology PhD program whereas every yahoo with stars in his eyes is applying to the film school), and the odds tilt dramatically in the serious applicant's favor. (By "serious applicant," I include the vast majority of StudentFilms.com posters.)
This is not to say that you should slack off while assembling your materials. By all means, put your best foot forward. But pretty please, do not listen to anyone who makes it sound like your work must show flashes of genius in order to stand a chance.
As I wrote in last year's installment of this post:
"I guess my advice is, do yoga. Go a couple rounds with the bag. Listen to river sounds as imagined by disinterested foley guys. Whatever.
Just breathe. You'll be fine."
It's still true.
--Icarus
(Requisite CV: got into UCLA, USC, and AFI. I attend USC.)
First: to debunk some rumors, USC is not Harvard Law, and UCLA is not Juilliard. The USC Grad Screenwriting Program accepts about 12-15% of applicants outright and waitlists another 5% or so; UCLA Screenwriting has similar numbers; AFI SW accepts almost 30% of its pool outright, and if you add in waitlisters, the number must approach 40%. I don't know the numbers for Production programs, except to say that USC Production admits a *higher* percentage of its applicants than does USC SW.
The point is, these are not hyper-selective programs that accept only three or four students a year. They are gigantically, humongously enormous grad programs which collectively accept hundreds of students annually. Add to this the fact that their applicant pools are not terribly self-selective (only smart, educated people are applying to the Anthropology PhD program whereas every yahoo with stars in his eyes is applying to the film school), and the odds tilt dramatically in the serious applicant's favor. (By "serious applicant," I include the vast majority of StudentFilms.com posters.)
This is not to say that you should slack off while assembling your materials. By all means, put your best foot forward. But pretty please, do not listen to anyone who makes it sound like your work must show flashes of genius in order to stand a chance.
As I wrote in last year's installment of this post:
"I guess my advice is, do yoga. Go a couple rounds with the bag. Listen to river sounds as imagined by disinterested foley guys. Whatever.
Just breathe. You'll be fine."
It's still true.
--Icarus
(Requisite CV: got into UCLA, USC, and AFI. I attend USC.)