USC writing creative challenge--between two people..

sophiedog

Well-Known Member
Hey guys,
So now turning to USC's creative challenges--both scenarios involve writing scenes between two people. Does this mean we can't bring in ANY other characters other than the two people? Say we have another character with like one line of dialogue, is that alright or do you think they mean solely between two people? Thanks!
 
It's between two people and only between two people. The scenes are set in closed containers for that exact reason. I bet if you think about it, you'll realize you don't need that third person with their one line of dialogue...it just seems the easiest way right now. Work with it...find a way to do what you want to do without that extra baggage.

They want to see you rise to the parameters they've given you...I strongly suggest you do not deviate from what they ask for, by length or premise...this is one of the few opportunities to show them that you can control your brilliance.


BEST OF LUCK!!
 
Thanks Jayimess, I know they must have some tricky reasons for setting it up like this lol. I'm assuming having someone talk on the phone counts as a third person (the person on the phone) so that is probably out too! Should be able to play around with it to remove them, anyway.
 
I had a one-sided phone convo in my "wants to leave/stay" scene, but you never heard the person on the other end...the person who wanted to leave was having the conversation in front of the one who wanted them to stay, and it was more about learning why she wanted to leave as a result of the eavesdrop, and watching the other to see that she wanted her to stay.

But no other dialogue.


BTW, I was looking thru my materials this weekend and I realized in the elevator, I did have a third character/one liner in my scene...the elevator speaker crackles and says "we'll get you out soon, folks," or something like that.

But we never see the speaker or hear from them again, otherwise, seen or unseen, they'd become another character in the scene.

Wow, that's a lot of seen/scene.

Anyway, yeah, just stick to those parameters, don't try to read between the lines for wiggle room, etc. Just do what it says the best way you can.

Good luck, and you know exactly how to get hold of me if you need to.
 
Ok great, that helps! I was working some more on the leaving scene yesterday and I also have it so that only one person actually speaks, changed it up so that I shouldn't need the phone call. And I may not use the full 5 pages, which I don't think they mind since it says 3-5.. Still have more time though, might end up redoing the whole thing!
 
Ha, that's funny, I worked and reworked and reworked my scenes a jillion times over eleven months, only to throw EVERYTHING, including my emo and PS, the day before the postmark date.

I often wonder...one, if I had used my original stuff, if I'd have gotten in straight up instead of off waitlist, and two, if I'd have gotten rejected.

Those what ifs don't matter though, do they?

Things like this remind me why writers should always follow their instincts.
 
Not to throw a monkey wrench into things, but I definitely had a third person in my elevator scene - Seen and Heard. In fact that character dominated the first page or so, and then made a prompt, albeit dramatic exit. I also had a fourth character (similar to Jayimess' third if we're counting that) that speaks through a television.

So I guess what I'm saying is, don't feel like it's the end of the world if you have more than two characters. They might prefer two - I don't know - but I think at the end of the day they really just prefer interesting stories.

Good Luck.
 
Its funny to think of how many elevator scenes probably have the speakerphone play a role. I'm writing mine and the speakerphone "speaks" also. It'd be fun to write one and have another criteria be: the speaker phone doesn't work.
 
Plan, I am so glad you've been coming back and offering a different perspective...your experiences, approaches, etc, are different from mine and illustrate that no applications are the same, both in what we send or how it's interpreted.

I guess that seals it...the only rule to applying to USC (and film school in general) is that there are no rules.
 
Hi all.

Well, almost in the deadline, I'm STILL having problems with my TREATMENT FOR USC.

DO I HAVE to start with a paragraph inclusing some topics like a DESCRIPTION (SYNOPSIS), the TITLE, CHARACTERS, etc...

Or, DO I HAVE to start with a TITLE and go directly to the story?

I don't remember if I'm supposed to insert my NAME o the pages...? Do I?

My history is a very short movie. Let's say, 10 minutes.. So, the treatment is almost a screenplay. There is no feelings, concerns of the character(s). It's a continuous history, that at the end, returns to the beggining.

Doubts, doubts...
 
Zumbi, this is a screenwriting applicant thread, so you might get more replies if you put this post in a production applicant thread...none of the writers have to write treatments.

And as for what you don't remember, just check the website and application materials.

Good luck.
 
Here's a question about the creative challenge. I write sketch comedy as well as screenplays. Would a sketch that fits the parameters of one of the creative challenges be a good idea or a bad idea for the application? On the one hand, I gravitate towards it because the maximum 2-4 pages is a great length to be able to execute a complete sketch, while a scene from a film would probably feel more like a snippet and less complete. A good sketch might also be a fun read for the admissions people. HOWEVER, the down side is that sketches are inherently less cinematic - for example, it says to emphasize visuals, which is not something one sees in sketches as much as in screenwriting.
Advice highly appreciated.
 
Sophiedog -- I was in precisely your boat at this time last year, and I did end up using a third character in my scene. I needed an outside voice to highlight the subtextual argument that was going on between my characters. The key word there, however, is needed. I suspect the SCA PTB are interested in your ability to restrain yourself and follow directions. So, to make a long story short, if you absolutely must have the third, do it. If not, I'd cut your risk and keep it to two.

Taraberyl -- Again, I'm going off my application package from last year, but if I were you, I'd write the scenes. No one is expecting you to write a "complete" short. They are, however, expecting you to demonstrate that you are a visual thinker and an evocative writer. I (mentally) pitched my argument scene as a flashback - a seemingly unimportant encounter that was a crucial piece of a larger 'one-that-got-away' story. Not only did this approach allow me to feel like it was a complete scene, the nostalgia factor also let me emphasize its hyperreality with visual detail. I knew I'd gotten it right when my proof-readers wanted to know more about the history between my characters; the admissions people are going to remember scenes that leave them intrigued.
 
Taraberyl, I would urge you in the strongest possible terms not to write a sketch for your USC app. I know a decent percentage of the screenwriting admissions committee, and I can say with 90% confidence that a not a one of them would want to see a sketch.

Here's why: USC Writing For Screen & Television thinks of itself as a character-centered program (whether it is or not constitutes a fair subject for debate). The overwhelming majority of the faculty is interested in grounded, three-dimensional characters in believable situations. Manifestly, those aren't the values of sketch comedy.

FWIW, the only person I know here who wrote a sketch for an application scene got in off the waitlist -- and under abnormal circumstances at that. After a year of USC, I am confident that he would full-throatedly second this advice.

--IA
 
Log your film school application with our Application Database so that we can improve our admissions statistics.



Users who are viewing this thread


Latest Accepted Applications

This Application in the Scattergram

Exclusive Supporting Member Benefits

Peak behind the admissions curtain. Supporting Members unlock full access to insightful data, interviews, and more...

Instant Keyword Alerts
Visible Supporter Badge & Highlighted Profile
Share Subscription with one family member or friend

Instant access • Cancel anytime

Latest Film School Reviews

  • UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television (TFT)
    5.00 star(s)
    The Best Production Design Program
    I loved this program with my entire being and would do it again without hesitation. The faculty are award-winning filmmakers who have led the...
    • Anonymous
  • University of Utah - Department of Film & Media Arts
    3.00 star(s)
    Not For Designers
    The film program at the University of Utah left a lot to be desired. For a program that could leverage Utah's growing film industry and stunning...
    • Anonymous
  • San Diego State University - School of Theatre, Television, and Film
    4.00 star(s)
    It's as good as you make it
    The access to free professional equipment with little resistance is awesome. A lot of film schools do not allow easy access in this way, and the...
    • Anonymous
  • Columbia University's School of the Arts
    2.00 star(s)
    Undergrad program is for film criticism not production!
    Columbia is a great place to develop taste. It is not a good place to learn how to make. They explicitly state that their goal is to teach you...
    • Anonymous
  • USC School of Cinematic Arts
    5.00 star(s)
    No better place to become a pro
    If you want to be a pro, there is no better entryway into the industry. If you want to be an artist, maybe not the best school for that. USC is...
    • Anonymous

Latest Applications

Latest questions

Latest Articles

Latest Accepted Applications

Applications
Articles
Forums
Film Schools
Scholarships
Back
Top