yellowzebra
New Member
Hi everyone!
I'm an international high school rising senior who wants to become a director in the industry. I want to study film in college, and I want to attend a school that has internship opportunities with Hollywood industry professionals so that I will be able to network with them for my future career. However, I need full financial aid, so options like USC or NYU are not available for me. I researched film schools that meet 100% of demonstrated need. After my research, I decided that I will apply Early Decision to either Barnard College or Northwestern. But I don't know which one so I would be very happy if you helped. I listed their pros and cons below.
1. First of all, I think that Northwestern has a more focused film major. As an aspiring director, I really liked Northwestern's production courses. They have separate courses focused on editing, cinematography, preproduction, directing and etc. Whereas in Barnard (or Columbia), there are more general production "workshops". Those workshops contain editing, cinematography, preproduction and all but they are not separated. So I believe the production courses in Northwestern will teach me more about the production itself and I will definitely gain more practical experience with filmmaking.
2. Secondly, film courses are Barnard are writing-intensive and rooted in the theory of filmmaking, which is essential for a good director in my opinion. Furthermore, they also emphasize the act of "visual storytelling" and developing a "director's voice". I think that this is really important to be a unique director that has a personal vision, which is eventually what I want. I didn't see that in Northwestern's course descriptions and I am concerned about whether I will be able to develop myself in that area if I attend NU.
3. In Northwestern's website, they say that film majors participate in many internships in LA or NYC to network with industry professionals. They also have great alumni connections and are called "Purple Mafia" in Hollywood. I believe these opportunities are very important to have a job in the industry. On the other hand, I didn't see this kind of thing in Barnard. I couldn't see any descriptions of internships or alumni meetings in their website and I am scared that I might not be able to network via internships if I attend Barnard.
4. One drawback of NU in my opinion is its location. Barnard is in the middle of NYC, an active film industry. Being in NYC as a film student can open many doors for me, especially during the academic year. Many of the Hollywood films are shot in NYC, which are one of the many opportunities. Whereas Northwestern is near Chicago, another vibrant city but not necessarily industry connected as NYC. I don't think I will be able to get internships during the academic year. NYC has many opportunities but being in Evanston I feel like I will miss those connections.
5. I am also thinking about applying to graduate film schools such as USC, AFI, NYU, UCLA and Columbia. Do you think attending either Barnard or Northwestern will affect any of my applications to these graduate schools? I would be very happy if you also noted this.
6. One last note: I didn't apply to either Barnard to Northwestern yet. I want to apply one of them as Early Decision since I need full financial aid and most of the aid is given in Early rounds. But ED is binding, so if I get in I have to go. Which one is a better option for me do you think? I am stuck and I would be very happy if you helped!
I'm an international high school rising senior who wants to become a director in the industry. I want to study film in college, and I want to attend a school that has internship opportunities with Hollywood industry professionals so that I will be able to network with them for my future career. However, I need full financial aid, so options like USC or NYU are not available for me. I researched film schools that meet 100% of demonstrated need. After my research, I decided that I will apply Early Decision to either Barnard College or Northwestern. But I don't know which one so I would be very happy if you helped. I listed their pros and cons below.
1. First of all, I think that Northwestern has a more focused film major. As an aspiring director, I really liked Northwestern's production courses. They have separate courses focused on editing, cinematography, preproduction, directing and etc. Whereas in Barnard (or Columbia), there are more general production "workshops". Those workshops contain editing, cinematography, preproduction and all but they are not separated. So I believe the production courses in Northwestern will teach me more about the production itself and I will definitely gain more practical experience with filmmaking.
2. Secondly, film courses are Barnard are writing-intensive and rooted in the theory of filmmaking, which is essential for a good director in my opinion. Furthermore, they also emphasize the act of "visual storytelling" and developing a "director's voice". I think that this is really important to be a unique director that has a personal vision, which is eventually what I want. I didn't see that in Northwestern's course descriptions and I am concerned about whether I will be able to develop myself in that area if I attend NU.
3. In Northwestern's website, they say that film majors participate in many internships in LA or NYC to network with industry professionals. They also have great alumni connections and are called "Purple Mafia" in Hollywood. I believe these opportunities are very important to have a job in the industry. On the other hand, I didn't see this kind of thing in Barnard. I couldn't see any descriptions of internships or alumni meetings in their website and I am scared that I might not be able to network via internships if I attend Barnard.
4. One drawback of NU in my opinion is its location. Barnard is in the middle of NYC, an active film industry. Being in NYC as a film student can open many doors for me, especially during the academic year. Many of the Hollywood films are shot in NYC, which are one of the many opportunities. Whereas Northwestern is near Chicago, another vibrant city but not necessarily industry connected as NYC. I don't think I will be able to get internships during the academic year. NYC has many opportunities but being in Evanston I feel like I will miss those connections.
5. I am also thinking about applying to graduate film schools such as USC, AFI, NYU, UCLA and Columbia. Do you think attending either Barnard or Northwestern will affect any of my applications to these graduate schools? I would be very happy if you also noted this.
6. One last note: I didn't apply to either Barnard to Northwestern yet. I want to apply one of them as Early Decision since I need full financial aid and most of the aid is given in Early rounds. But ED is binding, so if I get in I have to go. Which one is a better option for me do you think? I am stuck and I would be very happy if you helped!