Hey guys, I'm admitted in the 2019 directing MFA program and I'm here to discuss with you about one thing really important to me. Honestly, I have a strong preference to indie films or art films and I'm quite sure that's what I want to focus on in the future. I've heard Chapman has the best equipment and countless chances to improve its students practical experiences. But I'm a little bit worried about the teaching style is so commercial that I cannot adapt to it. What do you think? Is here anyone having the same concern with me?
This viewpoint may not be shared amongst others here, but for me storytelling is storytelling, whether you're working with a $100m budget or a $10k budget. If you can't nail the story you're trying to tell then it doesn't matter whether you think your film is artsy or commercial.
I think the designation of films being considered "indie" or "art" is disingenuous to filmmaking. The terms are generally applied to films giving the implication it's superior somehow. The reality is that it comes down to how it's financed and that's it.
There are plenty of completely terrible movies that would be considered indie or artsy films, just as there are plenty of big-budget films that simultaneously make money and are considered artistic achievements i.e. Dunkirk.
I'd recommend not limiting yourself by worrying about what are ultimately meaningless labels on storytelling/filmmaking.