sevs
Member
Of the MFA Production programs I'm more familiar with, I've noticed a lot of them can be filed into one of the two above-described categories. "Auteur-centric" programs that seem to focus more on helping you develop your individual voice as a storyteller include UCLA, UT Austin, Columbia, and AFI (kind of). The "team-based" programs that seem more focused on teaching you all the roles of production and letting you find your niche among a larger group of peers over time include USC, Chapman, LMU and AFI (kind of). I count AFI in both areas because in a way the curriculum is designed to help you focus on developing your craft in a select area, but then in another way you are working with peers in teams across multiple different areas of production, so it's not strictly speaking a "director's program" the same way Columbia's is, for example. I don't know enough about NYU to comment on which way they lean, but I know they pump out a lot of great, unique storytellers.
With that context established, my question is: Which do you think is the better model for a film school, if one could be said to possess more pros and fewer cons than the other?
And: Which type of program are you yourself pursuing and why?
With that context established, my question is: Which do you think is the better model for a film school, if one could be said to possess more pros and fewer cons than the other?
And: Which type of program are you yourself pursuing and why?